Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics

what % of ownership would be fair for a passive partner that is the primary or only signer on the no Options · View
ccie
Posted: Friday, October 16, 2009 2:09:46 AM
Rank: Gold

Joined: 12/31/2005
Posts: 173
Location: Dallas, TX
I have an interesting opportunity that I would like to bounce off this forum. An investor that I personally know and have a level of confidence in with his proven track record in real estate has a need to refinance an 8-plex out of hard money that has been rehabbed, filled, and stabalized. I don't have all the details yet as he will get that to me soon (profit & loss, rent rolls, receipts of rehab work, etc.). What I do know is that his net profit after PITI and operating expenses is about 25K, maybe higher (based on what his realised cash flow was for the last 6 months). Equity in the property is about 90K.

He is self employed as a real estate investor and realtor. As he is classified as a "real estate professional," he does not have a cap on what he can write off in real estate losses. Let's just say that his tax returns make it real hard for him to get bank loans these days as the banks go on documented income and will not go on stated income. My value add in the potential partnership is that I have a high earned income job, a very healthy debt to income ratio, and well established credibility in real estate as well. In short, I would be able to obtain the financing for the refinance as either the primary or sole signer and making the personal garuantee.

In an arrangement such as this, what do you think would be fair as far as a percentage of ownership? On the refinance it would not involve any money out of my pocket and will be strickly a passive investment for me. My initial thought was to be a 10% owner in the partnership with the option of buying additional shares at 1K per additional percentage of ownership up to and additional 40%. I think that his total out of pocket expenses in this deal has been about 40K. If I put in 40K, he would essentially be able to pull out his 40K and do the next deal. For me, I would essentially put in 40K into the deal as a passive investor as well as on the note for about a 31% cash on cash return plus an estimated future 45K capital gain. For the active partner, his return would be infinate. However, he would be trading sweat equity to manage an 8-plex for about 12.5K a year plus 45K in future capital gains.

I would like opinions both from the Active as well as Passive Real Estate Investors out there to validate if this would be a win/win deal or if one side seems a little lopsided. Thanks!

Cursing
One more Free Bird
Posted: Friday, October 16, 2009 7:16:48 PM
Rank: Copper

Joined: 8/3/2006
Posts: 13
Location: Tennessee
I am a real estate agent/investor for over 10 years and partner with passive investors who put up the credit statement and down payment on SFH in middle Tennessee. My LLC (me) does all the management, putting the houses on a long term lease with option to purchase. I collect payments, pay mortgages, etc. I pay my investors a fixed 20% cash on cash return. Ex: they put up $18,000. and receive a $300. check every month until the property sells (title transfers) which could be from 1-20 years. When title transfers they receive their $18,000. back plus another 20% lump sum (3,600). I have a dozen investors who have been with me for over 10 years who are very satisfied. They sleep well at night knowing their investment is secured by the equity in the property. I keep everything over their 20%. My monthly cash flow per property is usually between $200 and $400 per month. Your deal seems to be a win/win as long as both sides understand all the rules and exit strategies. By the way, I am currently looking for one or two more investors, that is all I can work with at one time. I can email a detailed Investment Prospectus to anyone seriously interested.

Successful Rich Dad student
Real Estate Investor/Agent
20% fixed ROI paid to my investors

BPT
Posted: Sunday, October 25, 2009 12:09:51 AM
Rank: Silver

Joined: 11/15/2006
Posts: 41
I am also a full time investor and have done multiple JV deals with cash/credit investors.

It really depends on the wants/needs of the investor. Are you looking for retirement savings? Cash-flow? Tax write off?

In some cases, we pay a fixed cash on cash return (10-15%), with zero equity position. Other times, we do a 50/50 equity/cash-flow split for investors who put up the down payment and closing costs.

Define your your goals (numbers and timeline) are and work to structure your deals accordingly. Decide what % of return is acceptable for you and seek out investments options which meet your needs. Don't focus much on what the other side is making. As long as your needs are being met and you are doing better than your other investing alternatives, it is a win.

Happy Investing.


' Don' t be afraid that your life will end, be afraid that it will never begin' - Anonymous
ccie
Posted: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 12:30:23 AM
Rank: Gold

Joined: 12/31/2005
Posts: 173
Location: Dallas, TX
Thanks for the input. Based on analyzing the deal a bit more, both myself and the other investor think it would be best to get the rents raised on the last unit under market rents and let sit for 365 days of seasoning. This would allow for a cash out refi to pull out all of his equity and some extra change as seed capital for the next deal. We found a private investor with sufficient funds to take the interim note out of hard money. He is moving into the area and will get some modest returns while he gets situated in the market area. He will invest in the next multifamily deal with the other lead investor so will be a good way to park the money while the next deal is identified, negociated, put into contract, due dilligence, and closed. As for myself, they will likely come back to me to help them get the note financed with the bank around March of next year. The bank requires that I be a 20% owner and recourse to take over the property, or at least the property management should the entity fail to pay the note. Makes sense to may as it also protects my interests. Great for me but I think is too much for just being the gaurantor on the note and being a passive in the deal. I will probably also volunteer to manage the property as far as collecting rents and filling vacancies for the 20% ownership.
Users browsing this topic
guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
©2010 CASHFLOW Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Other Network Sites:

Follow us on: FacebookFacebook